AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Isale tillotson eos4/13/2023 ![]() For the tantalum material, Tillotson EoS param-eters were already. Additionally, the model results are compared against the Mie-Gruneisen and SESAME equations of state already in the CTH database. These techniques are not implemented in the iSALE shock phys-ics code and I did not. We used the Tillotson equation of state (EOS). ![]() While some parameters may be considered as fitting parameters, all others have a physical meaning. The numerical code iSALE was used to simulate the impact of projec- tiles of various shapes and interior. The EOS is evaluated by comparing the response to previously published dynamic compression experiments. In the Tillotson EoS, parameters are: a,b,, , B(Pa), material bulk modulus A(Pa), initial and incipient vaporization material densities0and IV (g/cm3), initial energy, incipient and complete vaporization material energies E 0, EIV, ECV (J/kg). Granite was chosen as one of the typical geological materials. Table 1 lists the parameters for the Tillotson EOS that we used ( Allen, 1967 ). Addition of a cavitation model allows for treatment of liquid spall when the local pressure drops below the vapor pressure in events such as underwater blasts and high speed projectiles or fragments in liquids. The Tillotson EOS ( Tillotson, 1962) was used for both the projectile and target. SPH codes used a Drucker -Prager strength and a Tillotson EoS. User 2 also included a two layered setup with a 50 porosity layer on top of a 30 porosity layer. SALE code (Simplified Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian, Amsden et al., 1980). Models computed with iSALE applied a Tillotson EoS for basalt and a Lundborg strength (User 1), or an ANEOS for basalt and a Drucker -Prager strength (User 2). A total of 54 simulations were performed. For each target material combination (Y 0, ), we simulated nine impacts spanning projectile diameters L 40, 80, and 160 m and velocities v i 10, 30, and 100 km s 1. This EOS was implemented into CTH, Sandia National Laboratories Eulerian, finite-volume, shock physics code, for the general purpose of simulating hypervelocity impacts of metals, geologic materials, and liquids however, the salient features of this EOS in both compression and expansion are evaluated for water given the ubiquity of available data. 'Hydro code''Shock code' Pierazzo+, 2008, MAPS. We use an ANEOS EoS for the basalt and a Tillotson EoS for water ice (parameter values are listed in Table 1). A similar Moho topography is also modeled for some large lunar and Martian craters, which suggests that mantle deformation may play a prominent role in large crater formation.The Tillotson equation of state (EOS), which was originally developed for the hypervelocity impact of metals, was augmented with an additional region in expansion to provide full coverage of the density-energy space and a new cavitation model for liquids. These results demonstrate that deformation from large terrestrial impacts can extend to the base of the continental crust. A comparison with numerical modeling results reveal that immediately following impact a transient crater reached a maximum depth of at least 30 km prior to collapse, and that subsequent collapse of the transient crater uplifted target material from deep below the crater floor. and a Tillotson equation of state (Tillotson, 1962). The Moho is upwarped by ~ 1.5–2 km near the center of the Chicxulub crater, and depressed by ~ 0.5–1.0 km at a distance of ~ 30–55 km from the crater center. parametric study is conducted with the state-of-the-art hydrocode iSALE in order. We use seismic data to map Moho (crust–mantle interface) topography beneath the Chicxulub crater, the youngest and best preserved of the three largest known terrestrial impact craters. Conditions to Reproduce: For the particular attached gifs: use the colliding rubber rings test case, but 1) modify the ICs to set both ring velocities/internal energies to 0 and 2) change the Tillotson parameters to those of ice (as specified in Reinhardt & Stadel 2017) apart from AB9.47e3. Although the gravity models are non-unique, they do suggest that large impact craters are associated with structure at the base of the crust. The surface expression of impact craters is well-known from visual images of the Moon, Venus, and other planets and planetary bodies, but constraints on deep structure of these craters is largely limited to interpretations of gravity data.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |